mardi 23 décembre 2014

Los Angeles DUI Lawyer

Los Angeles DUI Lawyer

DUI Attorneys in Los Angeles CaIan Pancer runs a criminal defense practice that takes cases in San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles. He has worked on numerous high-profile criminal defense cases in State courts in Southern California and in Federal courts in Southern California and Nevada - cases that have been featured on news outlets such as ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and FOX. Mr. Pancer currently sits on the board of directors of the San Diego Criminal Defense Bar Association. He is a current or past member of the California DUI Lawyers Association, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the San Diego Criminal Defense Bar Association, and the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego. He is dedicated to providing you with aggressive representation in order to achieve the best result possible. Find out why executives, professionals and international clients choose the Law Office of Ian Pancer.

As a skilled Los Angeles DUI lawyer, Mr. Pancer is dedicated to the defense of DUI and criminal cases, from first offenders to felony drunk driving. Los Angeles DUI lawyer Ian Pancer knows that DUIs can be embarrassing and devastating to people of certain professions. Now is not the time to have a lawyer that is going to lecture you about your choices. The fact is, you are in trouble with the law and you need a non-judgmental advocate to give you straight forward advice about beating your case, period. And that is exactly what you will get. Mr. Pancer has handled countless DUI cases over many years in a multitude of courts, and now you get the benefit of that experience.

You have the right to fight the DUI charges and the loss of your driver’s license. You need an experienced, dedicated Los Angeles DUI attorney on your side to help mitigate the effects of this charge. We will carefully analyze the facts of your case to ensure that all applicable defenses are timely raised on your behalf. Every DUI case pits the DUI attorneys against the government and the police. And Mr. Pancer is no stranger to a fight against the government. His experience in State and Federal cases, which require opposing the immense resources of the FBI, Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office makes him an expert on the rights of the accused and the laws that govern how police interact with private citizens.

We prepare every case for trial because you can’t win them if you can’t try them. And nobody gets a good deal if the prosecutor knows you don’t try cases. In addition to numerous not guilty verdicts, hung juries and dismissals in DUI cases, Mr. Pancer has obtained these outcomes in cases from unlicensed driving to unlicensed contracting as varied as evading an officer, theft, grand theft, possession of ecstasy, possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana for sale, carrying a loaded firearm on one’s person, having a concealed firearm in a vehicle, trespass and battery.

Actual Cases Include:

People v. E.L.D:
Client was charged with evading an officer. She drove ten miles on the freeway after an officer activated his overhead lights and sirens and ordered her to pullover. She ended up being followed by approximately 14 police cars and a helicopter by the time the pursuit was over. Client was also charged with driving without a valid license. The case ended in a hung jury on both charges and the judge dismissed the case.

People v. D.W.:
Officers testified they followed behind client for about a mile and believed he was driving under the influence. They testified they pulled up right behind his car, they saw him step out of the driver seat, and they saw two other vehicle occupants step out of the passenger side. Client was arrested for DUI and his blood alcohol level tested at a .21%. Client and another occupant of the vehicle testified that client was not the person driving, and Mr. Pancer was able to persuade10 of the 12 jurors that client was not the driver. After a hung jury, 10 to 2 in favor of not guilty. The judge dismissed the case.

People v. A.C.:
A security officer from a hardware store testified he saw client acting suspiciously, followed him, and saw him reach onto a shelf holding copper pipe fittings. He testified he saw client take some items, place the items in his pocket and leave the store without paying. He testified that he forcibly detained client, who was trying to leave the store. There was video surveillance of client resisting the security officer and attempting to leave the store. The officer testified that he recovered the items in question from client’s pocket. Client testified he had actually brought the items into the store. All 12 jurors found client not guilty.

C

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire